Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations

authored by: Jacopo Ambrosj, Kris Dierickx, Hugh Desmond
Abstract: Scientists are increasingly expected to incorporate socio-political considerations in their work, for instance by anticipating potential socio-political ramifications. While this is aimed at promoting pro-social values, critics argue that the desire to serve society has led to self-censorship and even to the politicization of science. Philosophers of science have developed various strategies to distinguish between influences of values that safeguard the integrity and freedom of research from those impinging on them. While there is no consensus on which strategy is the best, they all imply some trade-offs between social desirability and the aims of science. If scientists are to incorporate socio-political considerations, they should receive relevant guidance and training on how to make these trade-offs. Codes of conduct for research integrity as professional codes of ethics can help scientists navigate evolving professional expectations. Unfortunately, in their current status, these codes fail to offer guidance on how to weigh possibly conflicting values against the aims of science. The new version of the European Code of Conduct (2023) is a missed opportunity in this regard. Future codes should include guidance on the trade-offs that professional scientists face when incorporating socio-political considerations. To increase effectiveness, codes should increase the attention that scientists have for such trade-offs, make sure scientists construe them in appropriate ways, and help scientists understand the motivations behind pro-social policies. Considering the authority of these documents—especially the European one—amending codes of conduct can be a promising starting point for broader changes in education, journal publishing, and science funding.
Organisation(s): Institute of Philosophy
External Organisation(s): KU Leuven
University of Antwerp (UAntwerpen)
Type: Comment/debate
Journal: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Volume: 11
No. of pages: 6
Publication date: 17.06.2024
Publication status: Published
Peer reviewed: Yes
ASJC Scopus subject areas: Business, Management and Accounting(all), Arts and Humanities(all), Social Sciences(all), Psychology(all), Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Electronic version(s): https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03261-5 (Access: Open)

BibTeX

@article{4afda51c09bc40a9a7381f3fdac03965,
title = "Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations",
abstract = "Scientists are increasingly expected to incorporate socio-political considerations in their work, for instance by anticipating potential socio-political ramifications. While this is aimed at promoting pro-social values, critics argue that the desire to serve society has led to self-censorship and even to the politicization of science. Philosophers of science have developed various strategies to distinguish between influences of values that safeguard the integrity and freedom of research from those impinging on them. While there is no consensus on which strategy is the best, they all imply some trade-offs between social desirability and the aims of science. If scientists are to incorporate socio-political considerations, they should receive relevant guidance and training on how to make these trade-offs. Codes of conduct for research integrity as professional codes of ethics can help scientists navigate evolving professional expectations. Unfortunately, in their current status, these codes fail to offer guidance on how to weigh possibly conflicting values against the aims of science. The new version of the European Code of Conduct (2023) is a missed opportunity in this regard. Future codes should include guidance on the trade-offs that professional scientists face when incorporating socio-political considerations. To increase effectiveness, codes should increase the attention that scientists have for such trade-offs, make sure scientists construe them in appropriate ways, and help scientists understand the motivations behind pro-social policies. Considering the authority of these documents—especially the European one—amending codes of conduct can be a promising starting point for broader changes in education, journal publishing, and science funding.",
author = "Jacopo Ambrosj and Kris Dierickx and Hugh Desmond",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1057/s41599-024-03261-5",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",
issn = "2662-9992",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
}