Tweeted Fact vs Fiction
Identifying Vaccine Misinformation and Analyzing Dissent
- verfasst von
- Shreya Ghosh, Prasenjit Mitra
- Abstract
In this paper, we develop an end-to-end knowledge extraction and management framework for COVID-19 vaccination misinformation. This framework automatically extracts information consistent and inconsistent with scientific evidence regarding vaccination. Additionally, using novel natural language processing methods (including triple-attention based sarcasm detection and utilizing topic-based similarity scoring, agglomerative clustering, and word embedding vectors for misinformation category identification and counter-fact summarization in a semi-supervised way from web-based sources), we explore public opinion towards vaccination resistance. Our knowledge extraction pipeline constructs knowledge-bases automatically, categorizes vaccine dissenting tweets into 15 misinformation categories automatically, and effectively analyzes discourses in those tweets. Our contributions are as follows: (i) the proposed knowledge extraction framework does not require huge amounts of labelled tweets of different categories (our method uses only 50-labelled tweets for each of 15 misinformation categories, in stark contrast to existing approaches that typically rely on 10,000 or more labelled tweets), and (ii) our module outperformed baselines by a significant margin of ≈ 8% to ≈ 14% (F1 score) in the classification tasks using Twitter dataset.
- Organisationseinheit(en)
-
Forschungszentrum L3S
- Externe Organisation(en)
-
Pennsylvania State University
- Typ
- Aufsatz in Konferenzband
- Seiten
- 136-143
- Anzahl der Seiten
- 8
- Publikationsdatum
- 15.03.2024
- Publikationsstatus
- Veröffentlicht
- Peer-reviewed
- Ja
- ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Artificial intelligence, Computernetzwerke und -kommunikation, Information systems, Informationssysteme und -management, Sicherheit, Risiko, Zuverlässigkeit und Qualität, Sozialpsychologie, Kommunikation
- Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
- SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
- Elektronische Version(en)
-
https://doi.org/10.1145/3625007.3627307 (Zugang:
Geschlossen)